---

The world is producing more information about climate risk than at any previous moment. Satellites can monitor crops from space, artificial intelligence can process enormous datasets in seconds and predictive systems can identify potential disruptions before they become visible on the ground. Yet knowing that a crisis is coming does not necessarily mean institutions are prepared to stop it.

That tension emerged during Climate Week NYC 2026 at “Acting at the Speed of Crisis: Challenges & Opportunities for Food Security and Rapid Response,” a summit that brought together leaders from technology, agriculture, humanitarian organizations, philanthropy and policy to examine how data and artificial intelligence can strengthen responses to increasingly complex global disruptions.

Climate Intelligence Is Getting Faster

Climate events develop quickly, while traditional systems for collecting and interpreting information can take considerably longer. Artificial intelligence is beginning to narrow that gap by helping organizations analyze quantities of information that would be impossible for human teams to review manually.

Satellite imagery, agricultural records, weather information and economic indicators can increasingly be combined to identify patterns affecting crops, food availability and vulnerable communities.

Inbal Becker-Reshef, Managing Director of Microsoft AI for Good Lab and Founder and Co-Director of NASA Harvest, emphasized during the summit that combining technology with local expertise can improve both early-warning systems and the ability to respond when risks begin to materialize.

The distinction is important. The value of artificial intelligence in climate response is not simply its ability to produce additional information. Its potential lies in reducing the time between detecting a problem and understanding where action may be required.

When Too Much Data Becomes Its Own Problem

Organizations working on climate and food security increasingly face a paradox: they have access to more information while simultaneously struggling to process it.

Andrew Zolli, Chief Impact Officer at satellite-imaging company Planet, described human attention as one of the primary constraints in a world where the volume of available data continues to expand.

AI can help filter that information, identify anomalies and prioritize signals requiring human attention. For governments, humanitarian organizations and companies operating global supply chains, those capabilities could make it possible to recognize disruptions earlier and allocate resources more strategically.

The economic implications extend beyond disaster response. Earlier insight into agricultural conditions can inform procurement decisions, commodity planning, insurance strategies and infrastructure investment, turning climate intelligence into an increasingly valuable component of risk management.

Satellite Data Is Changing How Food Security Is Monitored

The importance of remote information becomes particularly visible when physical access to agricultural regions is limited.

During the Climate Week discussion, Ukraine’s Minister of Agrarian Policy and Food, Taras Vysotskyi, highlighted the importance of satellite data for understanding agricultural land affected by the war in Ukraine.

The example illustrates how climate technology can serve a broader function. Satellite imagery and AI systems can provide insight into agricultural production even when conflict, disasters or geographic limitations make conventional monitoring difficult.

Máximo Torero Cullen, Chief Economist of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, also described artificial intelligence as an opportunity for agriculture at a moment when food systems face overlapping climate, geopolitical and economic pressures.

AI Is Also Moving Into Local Policymaking

The technology is not being applied exclusively to global monitoring.

Planet Reimagined and the Hewlett Foundation presented Grapevine, an initiative designed to use AI to help cities identify and adapt policies implemented elsewhere. The concept allows local governments to compare their circumstances with similar cities and evaluate solutions that may be transferable to their own communities.

That could address one of the less visible inefficiencies in climate policy. Cities around the world frequently confront similar problems but lack the staff, time or resources required to research how other governments have responded.

Using AI to organize those experiences could allow proven ideas to move between cities more quickly, reducing the need for every government to begin from zero.

Better Predictions Do Not Automatically Produce Faster Action

The most significant limitation discussed in New York was not technological.

David Beasley, former Executive Director of the United Nations World Food Programme and a Trustee of The Rockefeller Foundation, cautioned that the quality of the information remains fundamental. Advanced systems trained on incomplete or unreliable data can still lead decision-makers in the wrong direction.

But even accurate information reaches a limit.

Ertharin Cousin, Founder and CEO of Food Systems for the Future, pointed to a deeper challenge: organizations may be increasingly capable of predicting crises while still lacking the political authorization, financing or institutional capacity required to act at comparable speed.

That gap may ultimately determine how transformative climate-focused AI becomes.

A system capable of predicting a food shortage months earlier creates little value if financing arrives after the emergency has already intensified. Similarly, identifying vulnerable agricultural regions cannot protect them unless governments, companies and humanitarian organizations have the resources and authority to respond.

Technology Can Accelerate Decisions, Not Replace Them

The conversation at Climate Week NYC 2026 offered a useful counterpoint to the increasingly expansive expectations surrounding artificial intelligence.

AI can process information faster. Satellites can reveal conditions across enormous territories. Predictive models can identify patterns that would otherwise remain hidden. None of those capabilities, however, can substitute for infrastructure, policy, financing or institutional leadership.

Helen Clarkson, CEO of Climate Group, underscored that data can show organizations where opportunities exist, but information alone does not create behavioral or structural change.

That distinction may become increasingly important as investment in climate technology accelerates. The next competitive advantage may not belong simply to organizations with access to the most sophisticated data. It may belong to those capable of translating that intelligence into decisions before a warning becomes a crisis.

Artificial intelligence can make the world faster at understanding climate risk. Climate Week NYC 2026 demonstrated why the next challenge is making institutions equally fast at responding to it.

```